Relationship between Inflation,Growth,Capital

India is a growing economy, set to join a League of Nations (BRIC) to emerge as one of the emerging economies by the middle of the third millennium. It had an impressive growth rate, upward of 9%, its Foreign Exchange reserves enlarged more than 7 times of the figure in 2003-4, its trade grew to beyond three century mark, its poor slowly were growing and had better living conditions, the purchasing power of the middle class grew, and consumption began to drive the economy. Inflation was at its lowest, in contrast to the high growth returns. India was on the red carpet growth to prosperity. India slowly emerged as a economic powerhouse with investments from abroad soaring in making it the favourable foreign investment destination. Ever since March, 2008 there has been a constant increase in the rate of inflation. In Nov 2008, it touched 10.45%, in Dec 2009 it was 14.97%, in January 2010 it went up to 16.22% and in September 2011 it posted 9.72%. The Government, made a monetary Policy amendment by increasing the low Bank interest rates, which has seen revision more than 13 times since the last 18 months. Relentlessly, the Banks went on expanding the interest rates with the hope that they would be able to slide down the inflationary impact on the economy. More they tried, more difficult it became. India’s war against inflation resulted in sacrificing its growth which came down to 7.5% and may slip to 7.2%. The Government gave the Magna Carta to the Oil companies to decide the petrol prices. The Petrol prices have been increased repeatedly, so that it increased the percentage of inflation. It has become very difficult to tame inflation as it has gone beyond a point. Our markets have seen a lull. Foreign investors do not beseech India like before. There has been a fall in percentile of investment. American economy is creating a Permbra situation in the Indian economy. When markets are lull, it passes on the feel to the Economy. Interest hike has seen the Non performing asset of Banks increase by 20% in the period, June-Sept 2011 (Rs 16,132 Cr). All the Public sector restructured their loans and 17% of all the advances show that it had turned bad. Many Small Medium Enterprise are turning red or closing shop as they are not able to get proper and timely Credit. A propped up credit at 14% makes availing loans unviable for units. Big Corporate companies can opt for External borrowings, but with the Indian Rupee turning meek against the dull Dollar has made foreign loans costlier than before (Rs 49.70= 1 $)(from Rs 40 = 1 $). They are indeed, waiting for some threshold. The aviation industry is in the dole drums because of this. The Exporters are also facing brunt on this front. Their dollar worth of goods account for more rupees while the expenses in the domestic market has gone sky high. The cost of credit through Foreign Exchange for Packaging Credit is not sustainable. Conflict over Policy objective higher level of well-being, that is means of achieving it- by higher growth or by lower inflation, trade-off is necessitated; both cannot be achieved simultaneously. Government intervention in financial and goods markets, due to macroeconomic rigidities has caused market failure and microeconomic instability. Inflation is harmful rather than helpful to growth. Policy implications will see inflation- growth nexus. Negative co-relation between inflation and growth in the long run would result in the influence of the former on reducing investment, productivity and growth. We are in the thick of core inflation, inflation on the basis of CPI, food inflation, low asset creation, declining value of parity (Rupee- Dollar parity), monetary inflation, and price inflation. There was a semblance of over heat in the economic growth and its irrational exuberance has seen the trajectory of growth going hay-wire. More than the fiat currency (paper currency), over supply of bank notes has resulted in depreciation of their value (Classical Economists David Hume & Ricardo). This may perhaps be one reason that the Draft which had a life of 6 months was traded in the market between persons. (This was treated like commodity money). Money is what money does. Money is transferable. It is constantly exchangeable. So long as money is in circulation, money gives equal value of other goods and services. Somebody may invest money to make some product. He employs workers and other managerial persons who look after his unit. They buy the raw materials out of the funds from their working capital and manufacture end product for sale to some wholesaler or retailer, on receipt of which he pays the money towards the cost of the goods which are demanded on the basis of Invoice. He pays the money and takes the consignment and sells the same and makes money. Again, he places the order. These steps are repeated. The money received is put in the Bank account. Salaries are paid to workmen, other staff on duty. Bills of Raw material supplier, embellishment supplier, packaging supplier, transporter, telephone bill, electricity bill, other temporary staff bill, other bills towards purchase of merchandise, etc are all paid, and they in turn pay for goods and services. There is circulation of money. Bank charges interest rates. The owner takes the Profit. Money capital is recycled again and again, and another session he will restart the cycle of reproduction with the aim of accumulating more capital and its disbursal. Suppose, the businessman feels that he does not want to continue his industry, so he sells his company to somebody and puts the entire corpus in the Bank. Instead of putting his money-capital back into commodities, he invests it in the bank. He now holds in his hands a claim to capital, perhaps in the form of a bank-account, or a bond, shares or whatever, rather than capital as such. Now his money lies idle in the bank vault. But his claim to the money is secure. However neither his claim nor the money itself are capital as such and can earn no interest, because the money is not in circulation. By its being in the self, it is not expected to produce more money. The Bank, need to loan this money to somebody. May be one person. Or many persons. The persons who have availed the loan should use it productively to earn a return by which he can circulate the money, pay interest, instalments due to the Bank out of his profit. The Bank should pay interest to the depositor as well. It should also make profit to be in business of banking. However, as the class of speculators, bankers, brokers, financiers, and so on, grows, as is inevitably the case wherever the mass of capital in a country reaches a sufficient scale, what happens is, for example, the bank finds that it is able to loan out far more than it has deposited in its vaults; speculators can sell products that they do not possess, “the right kind of person” is good for credit even when they have nothing, .etc., etc. Thus one and the same unit of productive capital may have to support not just the one retired industrialist who deposited his savings with the bank, but multiple claims on one and the same capital. If the bank accepts one million as Savings, but loans out ten millions, each of those ten millions has equal claim to that same value. This is how fictitious capital comes about. Fictitious Capital is value, in the form of credit, shares, debt, speculation and various forms of paper money, above and beyond what can be realized in the form of commodities. The ability of the bank to make unsecured loans is dependent on “confidence”, and at times of expansion and boom, the mass of fictitious capital grows rapidly. Then, when the period of contraction arrives, and the workers can no longer feed the voracious appetites of all these capitals, the bank finds itself under pressure and calls in its loans, defaults occur, bankruptcies, closures, share prices fall, and things fall back to reality – fictitious value is wiped out. In times of recession, even good, useful commodities cannot be sold because money and credit has become scarce, and the commodities prove to be valueless. Fictitious capital is that proportion of capital which cannot be simultaneously converted into existing use-values. It is an invention which is absolutely necessary for the growth of real capital, it constitutes the symbol of confidence in the future. It is a necessary but costly fiction, and sooner or later it crashes to earth. Roughly every ten years, the mass of fictitious capital grows while trade is good, and then, as the capacity of the workers to sustain the mass of hangers on reaches its limits, the downturn gathers momentum and fictitious capital is wiped out, and the cycle begins again. The scale of these crises grew continuously until the Wall Street Crash of 1929, and the Great Depression of the 1930s. The Depression and the War which followed wiped out all the accumulated mass of capital so that a new cycle of reconstruction could begin again in 1945. The New Deal in the US, Keynesian economic policies and particularly the international monetary arrangements set up at the Bretton Woods Conference of July 1944, created conditions for an exceptionally long period of growth after the War. The particular mechanism for the creation of an unprecedented mass of fictitious value in this period was the role assigned to the US dollar as the medium of international exchange in lieu of gold. Under the Mashall Plan, Europe was rebuilt and the US capitalist class further enriched by the labour of all those workers who did the rebuilding. But capital could not organise that reconstruction other than by creating a new mass of fictitious capital, in the form of inconvertible dollars. Today, we are seeing the declining value of the Dollar. There is currency depreciation. By the mid-1960s this mass of fictitious capital began to collapse and world entered a prolonged period of crisis. The mass of fictitious capital circulating in the money markets, futures exchanges and so on today is, however, far greater than ever before. 98% of the value of monetary transactions in the world is speculative, only 2% involve actual use-values. Capital continues to exist by means of the delicate balancing act performed by all the governments and banks of the major capitalist countries, staving off the collapse of this gigantic and parasitic fantasy. The collapse of Banks due to ‘mortgage crisis’ can be attributed to this fictitious capital. The Banks could not recover the debt as the value of property had shrunk. Money is substitute to Capital (Tobin effect). Money, according to Stockman, is complimentary to Capital.